Sir John Eric Sidney Thompson (31 December 1898 – 9 September 1975) was an English Mesoamerican archeologist and epigrapher. His contributions to the understanding of Maya hieroglyphs lead him to be one of the foremost mid-20th century anthropological scholars. He was generally known as J. Eric S. Thompson in print and Eric Thompson to his colleagues.
Contents |
Thompson was born on December 31, 1898 to father George Thompson, a distinguished surgeon and fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Thompson was raised in the family home on Harley Street in London.[1] At the age of 14 he was sent to Winchester College to receive an independent education.
In 1915, at the beginning of WWI, Thompson used the assumed name Neil Winslow in order to join the British Army while underage. A year into service he was wounded and sent home to recover, first in Huddersfield then Seaford. He continued to serve in the Coldstream Guards until the end of the war, ending his service at the rank of officer.
After the war Thompson left for Argentina to work as a gaucho on a family cattle farm. When he returned to England in the early 1920s Thompson published his first article on his experience in Argentina, titled A Cowboy’s Experience: Cattle Branding in the Argentine in the Southwark Diocesan Gazette.
Thompson first considered a medical or political career however he later decided to study anthropology at the Fitzwilliam House at Cambridge University under A.C. Haddon. With the completion of his degree in 1925, Thompson wrote to Sylvanus G Morley, the head of the Carnegie Institution’s project at Chichen Itza, to ask for a job, inquiring about a field position.[2] Morley accepted Thompson, most likely due to the fact that Thompson had previously taught himself to read Maya hieroglyphic dates, an accomplishment that was highly valued by Morley who also had a passion for Maya hieroglyphics.
In 1926 Thompson arrived in the Yucatan of Mexico under the direction of Morley to work at Chichen Itza. Here he started working on the friezes of the Temple of the Warriors. In his autobiography, Maya Archaeologist (1936), Thompson referred to the friezes as "a sort of giant jigsaw puzzle made worse by the fact the stones had been carved before being placed in position" accurately describing his fist field experience.[3]
Later that year Morley sent Thompson to report on the site of Coba, located to the east of Chichen Itza. During the first field season at Coba, Thompson deciphered the dates on the Macanxoc stela. Morley, the foremost epigrapher, did not originally agree with the readings of the dates. It was not until a return trip to Coba that Morley was persuaded by Thompson’s readings, marking his emergence as a prominent scholar in the field of Maya epigraphy.[4] Within the next year Thompson took post as the Assistant Curator at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. He would work there until 1935 when he left for a position at the Carnegie Institution in Washington D.C.
In 1926, while employed by the Field Museum Thompson, under the supervision of Thomas A. Joyce and the British Museum partook on an expedition to Lubaantun in British Honduras. It was during the fieldwork at Lubaantun that lead Thompson to disagree with Joyce’s argument for the early “megalith” and “in-and-out” style of architectural stratigraphy. Thompson argued that the “in-and-out” constructions were due to root action.[5] This root action disturbed the construction by pushing the rocks out in the fashion of the “in-and out” construction that invalidated Joyce’s argument.
Toward the end of the first season at Lubaantun, the site of Pusilha was discovered and Thompson was sent to investigate with his guide, Faustino Bol. Thompson’s subsequent interactions with his guide, who was a Mopan Maya, would later shed light on how Thompson viewed the ancient Maya and their culture. As a result of their long conversations Thompson concluded that is “was clear that archaeological excavations were not the only means of learning about the ancient ways.” This led to his first monograph, Ethnology of the Mayas of Southern and Central British Honduras(1930) which gave insight into the problems of Maya archaeological and epigraphic through the use of ethnographic and ethno-historic data.
In 1931, Thompson and Gann teamed up to publish The History of the Maya from the Earliest Times to the Present Day. Additionally, Thompson started on a new field project at the site of San Jose in Belize. Here his research was focused at an “average” Maya center in which the stratigraphy produced a ceramic sequence from the Preclassic Period to the Terminal Classic Period. The field report, published in 1939, contained Anna O. Shepard’s appendix on the temporal changes in ceramic material, which was the first use of “archaeological sciences”.[6]
Thompson was able to produce ceramic sequences at the sites of Tzimin Kax, San Jose, and Xunantunich. These sequences allowed for sites which lacked inscribed monuments traditionally used for dating, to produce a tentative date. The patterns presented by the data from the Petén region and Uaxactun allowed for these sites to fit within the cultural development of the Maya lowlands. In 1938 Thompson added to ceramic sequence, the discovery of the site of La Milpa. This sequence would hold strong until Gordon Willey’s research at Barton Ramie, which would lead to a sequence. The field season at La Milpa would be one the last ones for Thompson, though he was not aware of this at the time of his publication Maya Archaeologist.
While Thompson continued to publish on chronology, during the 1940s his main goal was to decipher the non-calendric hieroglyphs which composed the majority of the unread texts. Of the 8 papers he published in 1943, half were on epigraphic research. Thompson’s particular epigraphic focus was on the fish symbol and directional glyphs. Additionally, outside of epigraphy Thompson investigated tattooing and tobacco use by the ancient Maya.
Thompson’s focus on the non-calendric hieroglyphs produced the Carnegie monograph Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: Introduction.[7] Thompson did considerable work in the deciphering of Maya hieroglyphics. Notably, his contributions to the field of Maya epigraphic studies included advancements in our understanding of the calendar and astronomy, the identification of new nouns, and the development of a numerical cataloging system for the glyphs (the T-number system), which are still used today.
Thompson initially supported Morley's contention that history was not to be found in the inscriptions, however in light of the work of Tatiana Proskouriakoff in the 1960s with her article…. Piedras Negras stela, Thompson confessed that he was “completely mistaken.”[8][9] His attempted decipherments were based on ideographic rather than linguistic principles. In his later years he resisted the notion that the glyphs have a strong phonetic component, as put forward by the Russian linguist Yuri Knorozov. Thompson noted the weak points in Knorozov’s research, and therefore discouraged majority of the field from taking his work seriously.
Thompson continued to work with epigraphic and ethnohistoric problems until the end of his career. Thompson was, as he himself noted, of the last generation of "generalists" engaging in activities ranging from finding and mapping new sites and excavation to the study of Maya ceramics, art, iconography, epigraphy, and ethnology (on the side). Thompson sought to present the Maya to the general public with publications such as the Rise and fall of the Maya Civilization (1954) and Maya Hieroglyphs without Tears (1972). His writing was structured in a manner that presented the data without obtuse language use which allowed scholars and lay-persons alike to understand his work.
After his death many young Maya epigraphers blamed Thompson for holding back what became a very fruitful approach to the glyphs with his forceful and articulate disagreements. This sort of criticism seems, however, to rest on a gross overestimation of the actual power wielded by Thompson, since the value and correctness of the phonetic approach was not obvious in the 1960s and early 1970s. Michael D. Coe, one of the most prominent proponents of the phonetic approach while Thompson was still alive, stated that the degree of hostility was unwarranted. Nonetheless, the phonetic approach would come to be the prominent approach to decipherment. Coe writes in Breaking the Maya Code that Thompson had held back the field of Maya hieroglyphic decipherment for nearly four decades and it was not until his death that the age of decipherment really started.
Thompson was awarded four honorary doctorates in three different countries, along with being award the Order of Isabel la Catolica by Spain, the Aztec Eagle by Mexico in 1965 and the Quetzal by Guatemala during his last trip to the Maya lands with the Queen of England in 1975. Thompson was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II in 1975 a few days after his 76th birthday, becoming the first New World archaeologist to receive this honored distinction. He died nine months later on September 9, 1975 in Cambridge and was laid to rest in Essex, England.